Welcome to the new Energy Central — same great community, now with a smoother experience. To login, use your Energy Central email and reset your password.

Fri, Aug 22

AI and Understanding Wildfire

Artificial intelligence is most valuable in messy, multi-dimensional problems — exactly what wildfire presents. Instead of reducing land to a static index, Athena uses AI to surface structure and motivation:

  • Which conditions accelerate ignition and spread?

  • Which corridors are most vulnerable under specific wind regimes?

  • Where will the next “repeat fires” occur based on historical burn patterns?

The result is more than prediction. It’s insight. It’s the ability for utilities to align mitigation, operations, and capital planning with the true terroir of fire.

Moving Beyond Static Indexes

For decades, wildfire risk has been managed through indexes — categories like High, Moderate, Low. While useful for broad planning, indexes flatten complexity. Two “High Risk” zones may look identical in a model but differ radically in their fuels, slopes, ignition potential, or exposure to the wildland-urban interface.

Athena goes further. Our system builds profiles of land that capture both intrinsic features (fuel load, slope, aspect, vegetation, WUI proximity) and probabilistic fire histories. The combination yields our Risk Class and a 0–10 Risk Score — a measure that captures both intensity and probability.

For utilities, that means knowing not just where risk exists, but why — and how to respond with precision.

Profiling vs Indexing

This shift from indexing to profiling mirrors a familiar story. In the late 1990s, Yahoo! catalogued the internet with an index. Google leapfrogged it by building profiles of websites, ranking them by context and relationships. Profiles proved more adaptive, scalable, and actionable.

Wildfire risk is at a similar turning point. Indexes may guide generalized hardening. Profiles enable targeted interventions — pinpointing which feeder lines, substations, or service corridors demand priority investment.

Marketers learned long ago that simple indexes (ZIP code, age, income) only go so far. Profiles — integrating behavior, history, and preference — predict outcomes far better. That’s why targeted marketing is effective.

Wildfire behaves in a similar way. Athena’s profiles capture the why of fire — the soil, slope, wind corridors, and vegetation structure that give each landscape its wildfire terroir. For utilities, this makes it possible to prioritize action where it counts most: the smallest, highest-risk pockets that drive system-wide exposure.

Revealing Complexity Without Losing Clarity

Edward Tufte, the pioneer of modern information design, argued that the best visuals reveal complexity while preserving clarity. Athena applies this principle with AI. Our system processes thousands of parcels, each with its own microclimate and fuelscape, and highlights actionable local variation that indexes blur.

This matters operationally. Risk can be evaluated at multiple scales — parcel, block, watershed, or service territory. Each layer reveals a different set of decisions for field crews, planners, vegetation management teams and financial executives.

AI and Utility Wildfire Liability

The power of Athena’s approach lies in quantification. By translating land features and fire histories into structured data, we make wildfire risk measurable at the same scale and precision that utilities already apply to reliability metrics and financial planning. Just as marketers discovered that consumer profiles could transform advertising from guesswork into predictive science, utilities can now move wildfire risk out of the realm of generalizations and into defensible numbers. There is as much data for AI to use in each acre of land as there is about every consumer, and when harnessed correctly, that data reveals where the greatest risks lie, how they are motivated, and what targeted actions will have the greatest impact.

This is the future of wildfire management: not just prediction, but understanding — risk quantified, structured, and actionable at every scale of utility operations.

Contact Charles River Associates for a Risk Spend Efficiency Assessment, based on Athena's data. Contact Copperleaf for insights into engineering design, based on Athena's data. And contact AiDash for better use of satellite and Lidar data, when combined with Athena's data.

Here is a base product sample that designed to for small, rural coops: the 2026 wildfire risk for Peninsula Light Company in Gig Harbor Washington

1