In a few weeks, voters will have their say in (arguably) one of the most energy-focused elections in US history. This midterms season, the growing grid squeeze ranks as a top issue among candidates vying for seats everywhere from state governments to Congress.
To cut through the campaign trail noise, we asked experts in the Energy Central orbit one simple question:Â
What are midterm campaigns getting wrong about energy?
Industry leaders pointed to two major themes: affordability and data centers.
On affordability: Candidates on the federal and state levels have promised to tame soaring energy bills. But hopefuls may miss key nuances in their campaign messaging.Â
For one, some politicians have claimed that the generation mix dictates bills. Wisconsin gubernatorial candidate Tom Tiffany (R) has blamed rising rates on the renewable transition, a common refrain from Republican lawmakers (and the Trump administration).Â
The reality? During Q3 2026, most utility rate-hike requests stemmed from increasing transmission & distribution spending, according to analysis by the nonprofit organization PowerLines.
These investments have grown considerably in recent years, noted Mike Beehler, a transmission engineer and former VP at consulting firm Burns & McDonnell. Two decades ago, they were “hardly measurable on somebody’s electric bill,” he told Energy Central. But that’s changing due to grid hardening efforts, the renewable rollout, and other ongoing trends.Â
And while energy affordability gets considerable airtime these days, politicians tend to avoid defining what it actually means, Beehler pointed out. Any answer, he argued, must prioritize customers living near the poverty line.Â
On data centers: With midterms approaching, some politicians are calling to pause data center growth (or, in some cases, halt it altogether). But, according to experts, that’s not a long-term solution.
Rather than releasing blanket statements against data centers, campaigners should acknowledge that our “lives are already inextricably tied to AI,” said Mark Gabriel, President and CEO of United Power.
With that in mind, candidates should direct data centers to cover the costs of new generation and grid infrastructure, Larry Eisenberg, principal at sustainable building firm Ovus Partners 360, told us.
The bottom line: Political candidates aren’t energy wonks (for the most part). So they don’t always “understand the complexity and interrelations of the energy systems with the economy and society,” said Charles Bayless, former CEO of Illinova Corporation and Tucson Electric Power. ”They cannot predict the unintended consequences, the second- and third-order effects of changes to regulation of the energy system.”Â
Bayless noted that energy system decisions impact everything from carbon emissions to the job market. So voters must look beyond the clear-cut positions on campaign agendas—and consider the long-lasting tradeoffs of each candidate’s gameplan. 🔮