As policymakers grapple with the complexities of climate change, the judiciary has emerged as a powerful force in driving climate action. Courts are increasingly being called upon to interpret laws, hold governments accountable, and shape climate policy. Â
Judicial activism—the concept of judges making policy decisions rather than merely interpreting law—has become central to climate litigation.
Landmark cases like Urgenda v. The Netherlands, where the Dutch government was ordered to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, exemplify the court's role in compelling action.
 Judges are creatively interpreting existing laws, such as constitutional rights to life, health, and property, to address climate-related harms. Â
A new wave of legal theories is expanding the scope of climate litigation. Human rights-based arguments, focusing on the impacts of climate change on vulnerable populations, have gained traction.Â
Additionally, intergenerational justice claims, asserting the rights of future generations, are being used to hold governments accountable for their climate obligations. These innovative legal strategies have the potential to reshape the legal landscape for climate action. Â
Transnational judicial dialogue is fostering knowledge sharing and cooperation among judges grappling with climate change.Â
HAVE YOU READ?  Can Transboundary Cooperation Solve Horn of Africa’s Crises?
By exchanging information and best practices, courts can strengthen their capacity to address complex climate issues. This cross-border collaboration is crucial for developing a coherent global approach to climate law.