Energy Central News

Curated power industry news from thousands of top sources.

News

Nuclear power still proven safe, reliable

Source: 
Delaware State News

Dr. Sowers' April 8 comparison of nuclear power to a dead horse is dead wrong. (Letter to the Editor).

Despite the recent closure of a few nuclear power plants, the remaining plants still supply 20 percent of the country's electric power without emitting air pollution or carbon dioxide. These plants could continue operating for decades, and new small modular designs show promise in adding to this clean, reliable fleet. When wind power failed in the coldest parts of the past winter, nuclear kept chugging reliably on.

The competitive problem these plants now face is from existing wind power subsidies. For years, new wind farms have received federal Production Tax Credits that pay $23 for every megawatt-hour of electricity they produce. A megawatt-hour is about the amount of power a typical Delaware household uses in a month. Wind generation generally occurs at night when it is needed the least. The credit price of $23 is about what wholesale power sells for in the middle of the night.

To sell power at night, wind farm operators can sell power at very low prices, sometimes at zero or even negative prices, knowing they will get the federal subsidy. Nuclear plants operate 24 hours a day, and can't trim back generation. The nuclear plants have to meet the wind farm price and lose money they would not have lost except for the wind subsidy.

One obvious solution is to stop offering wind power subsidies. These subsidies are being phased out over the next few years. However, existing wind farms will continue collecting subsidies for their first 10 years of production. Some temporary offsetting subsidy is needed for nuclear plants until the PTC disappears.

Dr. Sowers complains about nuclear power's radioactive waste. All the waste from nuclear power plants since the dawn of the nuclear age could be stored on a single football field in a 40-foot tall stack. Nuclear generators have paid into a fund to handle the waste. The fund has paid for a storage site in Nevada that has been proven safe after exhaustive testing, plus $30 billion sitting unspent.

Nuclear energy opponents have kept the site from opening. Notice renewable energy supporters have no plans, and never talk about the cost, of handling the coming millions of tons of hazardous electronic waste from decommissioned wind farms and solar panels. Existing nuclear power plants are a national treasure that deserve support for continued operation. David T. Stevenson

Policy Director Caesar Rodney Institute

Discussions

Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Apr 15, 2019 4:42 pm GMT

David, your points are especially relevant now that legislators in Ohio and Pennsylvania are working to reward nuclear power plants with a zero-emission credit. As recipients of renewable energy credits for years, solar and wind have enjoyed a competitive advantage in both states, despite the lack of much sun or wind in either.

Why are we bailing out wind and solar, again?

Here in California, a $23/MWh subsidy for Diablo Canyon Power Plant would be worth $414 million/year, and keep the plant generating clean, cheap nuclear non-intermittent electricity for residents. After this week's leak of the American Petroleum Institute's playbook for killing credits for nuclear, it seems like renewables were never a factor anyway.

Inside the Gas Industry's Plan to Sink Nuclear Power

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »