This group brings together those who are interested in topics around oil and gas exploration, drilling, refining, and processing.

221 Members

Post

How the Rockefellers Manufactured the Climate Liability Campaign

The #ExxonKnew campaign launched in 2015 after a series of articles were published accusing ExxonMobil of secretly studying climate change while outwardly denying climate science. Those articles kicked off an aggressive activist campaign, including a complex social and traditional media operation, and an aggressive legal strategy, all geared towards convincing public officials to investigate and prosecute the company.

What do all of these components, from the original articles to the academic research and activist groups, have in common? They have all been bankrolled by the Rockefellers, a wealthy family that owes its riches to the very company it is now seeking to destroy.

But the money did not come from the Rockefellers’ personal bank accounts. Instead, they used various entities including the Rockefeller Family Fund, Rockefeller Brothers Fund, and Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors to fund activists, media organizations, legal entities, public relations firms, and even the academic studies used to bolster the campaign and legal action.

What follows is the story of how this climate campaign came into existence, the key organizations involved, and how Rockefeller money has made each step possible.

Funding and Organizing the Activists

The coordinated #ExxonKnew campaign dates back to a 2012 conference held in La Jolla, California. The event was hosted by the Union of Concerned Scientists and Climate Accountability Institute, two groups who receive funding by the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss ways to compare energy companies with “Big Tobacco” and analyze the successful legal and public relations strategies used against tobacco companies in the 1990s. The end goal was to use the same playbook against energy companies to remove these companies’ social license to operate and secure large financial settlements through litigation.

During the La Jolla workshop, the attendees discussed opportunities to engage Congress and state attorneys general to investigate energy companies and subpoena their internal documents, as well as finding plaintiffs to sue based on climate impacts.

Notably, the same lawyers who secured the $200 billion settlement with the tobacco industry are now pursuing litigation against energy companies – namely Steve Berman, whose firm has represented various municipalities including King County, San Francisco and Oakland, and Sharon Eubanks, who has presented about litigation to various attorneys general offices.

Many of the La Jolla workshop’s attendees have become central figures in #ExxonKnew: Matt Pawa, the lead attorney in many of the dismissed climate cases and then head of the Rockefeller-funded Global Warming Legal Action Project; Climate Accountability Institute’s Rick Heede; Harvard researcher Naomi Oreskes; Union of Concerned Scientists’ Peter Frumhoff; and others who would continue to play leading roles in the campaign in the coming years.

Funding ‘Peer-Reviewed’ Research

In 2013, Rick Heede, the head of the Rockefeller-funded Climate Accountability Institute (CAI), took the lead in writing academic journal articles to bolster the campaign. He partnered with fellow CAI board member and Harvard professor Naomi Oreskes to write a series of academic papers attributing greenhouse gas emissions to specific companies, in a manner that vastly distorts the companies’ contributions: the research essentially blames consumers’ emissions on the companies that produced the raw materials for those fuels. Oreskes is credited with conceiving the La Jolla conference and has admitted to presenting her work to staff from a number of Attorneys General offices alongside Sharon Eubanks, who spearheaded the prosecution of the tobacco industry.

Taking Heede’s efforts a step further, Oreskes and her Harvard colleague Geoffrey Supran later published a study accusing ExxonMobil of misleading the public on climate change. The broadly criticized study was bankrolled by the Rockefeller Family Fund.

Funding ‘Journalism’

In September 2015, InsideClimate News (ICN) published the first article in its #ExxonKnew series, accusing the company of internally conducting research on climate change, while externally promoting a campaign denying its existence. A few weeks later, the Los Angeles Times published a nearly identical investigation by students of Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism.

David Kaiser of the Rockefeller Family Fund and Valerie Rockefeller Wayne of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund later admitted that they funded the Columbia program with the explicit purpose of writing the original #ExxonKnew pieces. ICN alone received over $1.2 million since 2014 from the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and Rockefeller Family Fund. In fact, Michael Northrup, director of the Sustainable Development grantmaking program at RBF, “provided the seed grant that got InsideClimate News started in 2007,” and RBF remains a “core funder” to this day.

To further the #ExxonKnew narrative, these media organizations coordinated with Climate Nexus, a sponsored project of the Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors, to amplify their reach and impact. Prior to the publication of one of its #ExxonKnew Stories, ICN’s publisher David Sassoon emailed an embargoed version to several staffers at Climate Nexus. A Climate Nexus staffer then emailed a group of activists calling the story the “perfect news hook” for their effort to go after “deniers.”

The Rockefellers then leveraged the manufactured news reports to reach out to several attorneys general who would be tasked with starting an investigation. One log of correspondence shows that Lee Wasserman with the Rockefeller Family Fund contacted then New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman’s office frequently in early 2015 regarding the “activities of specific companies regarding climate change.” Meanwhile, the President of the Rockefeller-funded Friends of the Earth emailed the Maryland Attorney General’s office, offering to brief him on “the potential consumer related complaints and other authorities re: ExxonMobil.”

Within weeks of the ICN and Los Angeles Times reports’ publication, the most “sympathetic” state attorney general – Eric Schneiderman – announced he had opened an investigation into ExxonMobil’s statements on climate change. A source later admitted that the Rockefeller-funded reports made the issue “more ripe” for an investigation of ExxonMobil.

Serving as Key Strategist

In January 2016, the Rockefellers re-convened their activist network – this time at a strategy session hosted at the shared offices of the Rockefeller Family Fund (RFF) and Rockefeller Brothers Fund, under the leadership of RFF Director Lee Wasserman.

Coming on the heels of Schneiderman’s announcement, this follow-up strategy session aimed to “delegitimize” ExxonMobil and develop a coordinated social media and messaging campaign, according to a memo obtained by the Washington Free Beacon. Meeting attendees included representatives from 350.org, Conservation Law Foundation, Greenpeace, Oil Change International, the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) and Matt Pawa.

Unsurprisingly, the Rockefellers funnel millions of dollars into each of these groups. The Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Family Fund, and Philanthropy Advisors have given nearly $5.7 million in grants to 350.org, the Union of Concerned Scientists, CIEL, Oil Change International, and Greenpeace in the past 10 years alone.

These Rockefeller-funded and coordinated meetings had a direct impact on action taken by public officials. Just two months after the RFF meeting, State Attorneys General from Massachusetts and the Virgin Islands announced they would be joining Schneiderman in opening their own investigations against ExxonMobil. Reuters confirmed that Peter Frumhoff of the Union of Concerned Scientists and Matt Pawa helped advise the attorneys general to take this action.

Funding the Litigation

The Rockefeller Brothers Fund gave Matt Pawa’s Global Warming Legal Action Project at least $200,000 to “develop and apply a tort law approach to global warming that will require major greenhouse gas emitters and fossil fuel companies to internalize the costs of their contributions to global warming.” The Conservation Law Foundation, which sued ExxonMobil for “decades long climate deceit” and has at least three former employees in Massachusetts Attorney General Healey’s office, received similar support.

In addition, the Rockefellers have direct ties to several of the climate lawsuits being brought forward by local and state governments, claiming companies are liable for climate change impacts. In Colorado, two non-profits, EarthRights International (ERI) and the Niskanen Center, are serving as co-counsel in the lawsuit filed by the City of Boulder, Boulder County and San Mateo County. The Rockefeller Brothers Fund awarded $200,000 to the Niskanen Center less than two months before the lawsuit was filed. ERI, who is also actively pitching cities in South Florida, lists the Rockefeller Family Fund as an institutional donor and appointed Kavita Ramdas, a trustee for the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, as a board member.

The Rockefellers are also helping bolster litigation by funding the public relations firms hired by law firms like Sher Edling to promote and assist with their respective lawsuits. Sher Edling currently represents 10 municipalities from California to Rhode Island.  Resource Media has received over $300,000 from the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and Rockefeller Family Fund since 2012. John Lamson, Executive Vice President of Resource Media is listed on Sher Edling’s press releases in the California lawsuits as the point of contact. During a November, 2017 presentation, Vic Sher admitted his coordination with Resource Media and others noting,

If you look at the media rollout for the cases that we’ve filed so far, it’s been amazing, it’s been terrific. Stories in The New York Times, The Washington Post, NPR, scholarly pieces commenting on the strength of this case compared to the past cases. And I will tell you that while we didn’t write any of those stories it’s not just by happenstance, and a lot of work goes into it by very smart people”

Conclusion

From the very beginning, the #ExxonKnew campaign has been organized and funded by the Rockefellers, whose resources have also supported anti-fossil fuel activists who want oil and natural gas companies to “pay” for climate change. Although the campaign has largely stalled, it hasn’t been from a lack of varying approaches by the Rockefellers – from paid-for “journalism” to state investigations and now municipal lawsuits.

It’s unclear what the next phase of this campaign may look like, but whatever it is, it will likely be made possible by Rockefeller wealth.

 

The post How the Rockefellers Manufactured the Climate Liability Campaign appeared first on EID Climate – A Project of IPAA.

Energy in Depth's picture

Thank Energy in Depth for the Post!

Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.

Discussions

No discussions yet. Start a discussion below.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »