The mission of this group is to bring together utility professionals in the power industry who are in the thick of the digital utility transformation. 

27,165 Members

Post

Energy storage at NREL

Three cranes looming over the campus of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory or NREL in the foothills west of Denver signal that the lab is moving ahead with fresh resources devoted to keeping the United States in the lead of international efforts on clean energy.

I visited NREL on Friday, the same day that the Republican Study Committee targeted "applied research" in the federal budget for zeroing out. (Another target: all remaining stimulus funding.) In other words, if the Committee convinces Congress, NREL will close its doors and end its job-creating, clean energy effort.  

The obvious connection to "intelligent utilities" here is that numerous utilities that we write about every day are pursuing grid modernization and intelligence through partnerships with NREL. A short list would include Arizona Public Service, Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Southern California Edison, DTE Energy, ConEd, San Diego Gas & Electric and Portland Gas & Electric. NREL also works closely with the U.S. Department of Defense and, of course, with the U.S. Department of Energy.

The good news is that NREL and its partner utilities are making progress in improving reliability and safety for the nation's electrical grids. I was granted an interview Friday with Dave Mooney, director for electricity, resources and buildings systems integration—a tongue twister for which he apologized. I had storage on my mind and it falls under his many responsibilities and crops up across several groups he manages.

Mooney gave me an excellent first pass at storage work at NREL by discussing the drivers and reviewing the three categories of time-related storage. (He mentioned a fourth.)

"There are many roles for storage," Mooney said, "it just depends on the time frame."

The first category is the sub-second time frame needed for frequency regulation, for which flywheel technology is being developed. The second is many seconds to minutes needed to smooth the output of a solar photovoltaic array, for instance. (That's referred to as "variability smoothing.") The third is bulk storage measured in hours, typically associated with technologies such as pumped-storage hydroelectricity ("pumped hydro"), compressed air energy storage (CAES) and large battery systems. A fourth, Mooney mentioned, is seasonal storage that could shift energy created in one season for use in another season. Wind blows hardest in winter/spring and not so much in summer, he pointed out.

"Don't bother pursuing that," he offered, helpfully. (Message: NREL has its hand in the topic because of that timeframe's substantial promise, but deployment isn't even on the horizon yet.)

Despite "background noise" on the storage issue, Mooney told me, NREL studies show that renewable penetration on the Western Interconnection could go as high as 35 percent without relying on storage. Apart from pumped-hydro generation, the U.S. now has about 2 percent to 3 percent renewable energy in its overall portfolio. And at low renewable energy penetration, storage is not the most economical technology, he said.

"Storage will play an important role," Mooney said, "but we can deploy much more renewable energy without storage."

NREL's work with SMUD, for instance, has shown that the old "10 percent rule"—that renewable energy penetration on the grid at 10 percent and above would require addressing power quality and, possibly, storage issues—is not a hard-and-fast rule. At SMUD's campus, a small-scale integration of 14 percent renewables at the distribution level did not adversely affect power quality.

"Storage research is fairly recent and rightly so," Mooney noted. "But we have to get the fundamentals now. We can't wait until we have high penetration of renewable energy on the grid, which is 'near term' in California."

Back to that term, "applied research," and the possibility of Congress killing off the federal role in public/private partnerships in the power sector. While Mooney carefully steers clear of overt political discussions, he does believe in the federal government's role in keeping America competitive among its international rivals and, on the home front, the job creation wrought by commercializing new technology.

"NREL is the most market-oriented of the national labs," he said, proudly. "We need to a path to market for the technologies we work on."

Phil Carson
Editor-in-chief
Intelligent Utility Daily
pcarson@energycentral.com
303-228-4757

 


 

 

Energy Central Contributor's picture

Thank Energy Central for the Post!

Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.

Discussions

No discussions yet. Start a discussion below.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »