This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.

10,192 Members

Post

Russia Sees South Africa as a Potentially Lucrative Market for Nuclear Power Plants

15504866232_12be0dd4f6_k

Rosatom, the Russian state-owned conglomerate that is building nuclear power plants in Russia and around the world, has confirmed that it is closely monitoring the public discussion that is taking place in South Africa over the newly released integrated energy plan.

South Africa’s draft energy plan isn’t being presented to the public as a fait accompli. Instead, the draft provides information about several likely scenarios, all of which would include the 9.6 GWe of new nuclear plant capacity described in the 2010 version of the plan. There is some variation in the timing for the completion of the first new units depending on selected strategies for optimizing costs and balancing completion delays against the increased quantities of pollutants that would be emitted by delaying the introduction of new nuclear.

In the base case, the first new nuclear plant would be starting by 2026 with the first tranche of a continuing construction program being completed by the early to mid 2030s. In that base case, nuclear energy would provide 29.5 GWe by 2050. All of the capacity would have to come from plants that are not yet built. South Africa’s only operating nuclear units were completed in the second half of the 1980s and are not expected to still be operating in 2050.

There is a scenario in the plan called a “nuclear relaxed” case that allows a delay in the currently proposed building plan based on the slower than expected growth in electricity demand. This case was considered available for study because, unlike the rest of the capacity additions identified in the 2010 plan, there are not yet any signed commitments to begin construction.

If this scenario becomes the selected plan, the delays will be limited. Even in the most pessimistic assumptions of demand growth, new nuclear will need to begin coming on line by 2030 instead of 2026 so that there is not a shortage of generation capability. The plan acknowledges that the delay doesn’t provide much additional time, given the long lead times required to plan and construction nuclear power plants.

In the nuclear relaxed case, the plan acknowledges that certain climate and air pollution targets will be missed as a result of continuing to rely on dirtier power sources for a longer period of time.

The plan authors worked hard to provide the public with information about costs, employment, pollution, fossil fuel dependency, water usage and, crucially in a country with historical development inequalities, access to reliable electricity.

Russian Advantages

Russia already has a firm presence in South Africa’s nuclear sector; Tenex, a subsidiary of Rosatom, has been supplying fuel to the Koeberg nuclear power plant for two decades.

Unlike most of the other nuclear plant vendors interested in being picked to supply South Africa all or part of its desired 9.6 GW (probably 6-9 units), Rosatom has a complete and running example of the design that it would be most likely to bid in any future tender in South Africa.

That reactor Novovoronezh 6 is a Generation III+ VVER 1200/392M with a nameplate capacity of 1114 MWe and a passive cooling capability. It was connected to the Russian power grid in August 2016.

Rosatom also has the advantage of a strong order book that includes 42 units so far. That order book makes for an attractive sales pitch from the company to participants in its supply chain. They can see numerous repeat purchases, making it worthwhile to make the investments in quality control, design engineering and material processing capabilities required to be an approved supplier.

Other Competitors

Rosatom will not be alone in trying to make committed nuclear plant deals with South Africa. Westinghouse and Areva NP have long had a presence in South Africa; the existing reactors at Koeberg were built by Framatome, one of Areva’s ancestor companies. Both Westinghouse and Areva have several modern units under construction, but neither of them have completed any of their Generation III or Generation III+ reactors yet. There are still unknowns to be discovered.

South Korea’s Kepco, which is currently building four of its APR-1400 reactors in the UAE should also be a strong contender. Like Rosatom, Kepco’s modern export reactor design, the APR-1400, has a complete, running model to show to prospective customers. That unit, Shin Kori 3, was connected to the grid in January 2016, so it has nearly a years worth of operating experience to share.

All of the potential vendors must be paying close attention to the public discussion about the size and timing of what could be another large nuclear building program.


Note: A version of the above was first published on Forbes.com under the headline Russia Is Eager To Add South Africa To Its Impressive Backlog For New Nuclear Plants. It is published here with permission.

The post Russia sees South Africa as a potentially lucrative market for nuclear power plants appeared first on Atomic Insights.

Photo Credit: flowcomm via Flickr

Rod Adams's picture

Thank Rod for the Post!

Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.

Discussions

Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Dec 26, 2016 4:49 pm GMT

Rod, it’s hard to ignore the potential for Rosatom to end up selling American utiltiies Russian nuclear reactors, and putting Westinghouse and NuScale out of business. With the opacity of Trump/Tillerson/Koch financial ties to foreign governments, we’ll possibly never know what price American competitiveness has fetched in the global marketplace – even after we have none left to sell.

When various slogans were being considered for Trump’s campaign, it’s rumored that “Throw America Under the Bus” was ruled out in the first round of consideration.

Jarmo Mikkonen's picture
Jarmo Mikkonen on Dec 27, 2016 6:25 am GMT

Bob, until 2015 10 % of US electricity was of Russian origin. The Megatons to Megawatts program supplied 50% of the fuel used by US reactors and did away with 20 000 Russian warheads.

Cooperation was and is possible. However, I doubt that Russians will sell reactors to the US due to fracking success.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »