This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.

Post

Rerouting network companies toward decarbonisation

image credit: Zsuzsanna Pató from the Regulatory Assistance Project

Financial incentives based on consumer interests and sound regulatory principles should be used to encourage electricity network operators to get ready to manage — and enable consumers to make the most of — future electricity markets, argues Zsuzsanna Pató from the Regulatory Assistance Project

 

Changing the course of a sailboat requires coordinated action. The skipper announces the manoeuvre to the crew, turns the rudder and works with the crew to readjust the sails. To achieve the maximum cruising speed with the prevailing winds and currents, all sails need to be swiftly positioned at just the right angle.

The need for fluid coordination also applies to the European power system. When circumstances arise, national regulators at the helm tack and make sure crews grab the right lines and adjust the sails. In other words, they leverage various regulations and procedures, including the way network companies are remunerated.

Future electricity networks will be tasked with accommodating increasing amounts of variable renewable energy resources, active consumers and new sources of demand from the electrification of heat and transport. Network operators, particularly distribution system operators (DSOs), need to play a key role in addressing the attendant challenges for grid operation and development.

As if coaxing a badly trimmed jib back on course, regulators can redesign regulation by linking the remuneration of network companies to outcomes consistent with the clean energy transition. This approach is called performance-based regulation (PBR). It is unlikely to be a coincidence that the new European legislation on the internal market for electricity explicitly recognises the value of performance-based network regulation.

 

PBR IN PRACTICE

The RIIO framework (Revenue = Incentives + Innovation + Outputs), introduced in the UK in 2013, is a good example of how providing financial incentives can help improve those aspects of a network company’s performance that matter most to consumers. RIIO is grounded in consumer interests and sound regulatory principles.

PBR is not only found in Europe,19 US states and the District of Columbia have either implemented or are considering the tool. In May 2019, the Hawaiian Public Utilities Commission opted for PBR to help attain its goal of a 100% renewable energy supply by 2045. In the project’s initial phase, the commission has started to define performance incentive mechanisms for interconnection experience, customer engagement and distributed energy resource effectiveness, while also establishing pertinent metrics and appropriate financial rewards and penalties.

 

EMBRACING NON-WIRE SOLUTIONS

PBR can be an important instrument for expanding a network company’s portfolio of solutions for serving an increasing and more volatile load.

As demand for electricity grows, network companies should consider “non-wire solutions” that often provide more cost-effective approaches to meeting energy and climate objectives than simply investing in grid expansion. These solutions are typically non-traditional transmission and distribution solutions, such as distributed generation, storage, energy efficiency, demand response, and grid software and controls. Non-wire solutions can help reduce load, deferring more costly investment in transmission and distribution lines or transformers.

In this spirit, the new European power market regulation requires network companies to assess demand side alternatives to traditional infrastructure investment and make use of them whenever they are less expensive. This is the common-sense thinking behind “efficiency first,” which simply means “reduce before you invest”.

Emphasis on outcomes means that PBRs create room for innovation by being agnostic to the methods network companies use to deliver outputs. This approach specifically targets the capital investment bias of many frameworks by revising the price formula to treat operational and capital costs in a similar fashion. The focus is on minimising total costs, and economic efficiency, in the longer run. Once these sails are trimmed properly, the skipper can lean back and just sail.

 

HARNESSING THE VALUE OF DEMAND-SIDE RESOURCES

The electrification of heat and transport will increase demand for electricity and, very probably, cause peak electricity demand to grow as well. Expanding networks for higher peaks is expensive. With the right technology and policies, demand-side resources such as electric vehicles (EVs) and heat pumps can be part of the solution for smoothing peaks and reducing infrastructure investment.

The integration of EVs and heat pumps at least cost requires innovation: controlled charging, dynamic pricing, smart technology and optimal use of existing infrastructure. Innovation that increases the utilisation rate of current assets, including smart grids, is most valuable. DSOs need to be motivated to transform grid operation from a “fit-and-forget” system with little automation or monitoring capabilities into a highly visible and actively managed network.

Distributed energy resources and active consumers will fundamentally alter the terrain of distribution network companies. The engagement of DSOs with consumers will go far beyond one-off connection requests and meter maintenance. Consumers are increasingly interested in installing photovoltaic panels or battery storage. They also want more granular energy consumption data, which requires a smart meter. DSOs can either foster or hinder easy and quick access to these services.

 

SETTING THE COURSE FOR PBR IMPLEMENTATION

When implementing PBR, the regulator must first identify the wider societal and political goals of regulation and assess what electricity consumers want from their DSO. By synthesising these objectives into long-term goals, regulators can avoid changing direction too frequently and tacking aimlessly at sea. Stakeholders need to come to a common understanding about what energy generation and delivery systems will provide to consumers at different waypoints, in five, ten and 20 years. In the decarbonisation context, this will mean more distributed energy resources and energy efficiency.

These guiding goals are then translated to specific directional incentives with measurable performance criteria to assess whether the goal has been achieved. Once the regulator determines whether the goal has been attained, it applies a positive or negative incentive.

Determining which metric to link to the financial incentive can be challenging. Performance criteria can be anchored in various standard power system metrics, such as capacity, generated electricity or avoided carbon dioxide, or in consumer impact indicators such as satisfaction, reliability, security of supply and similar ratings. Widely-used metrics for service quality are the standard system average interruption frequency index and the system average interruption duration index. European regulators developing PBRs will benefit from establishing design principles for PBRs. They should be simple, incremental and easily subject to reliable monitoring.

Changing the existing business model for network companies will not always be easy sailing. Nevertheless, as the old saying goes, Navigare neccesse est: We must sail.


Find more opinion pieces from energy transition experts and in-depth journalism HERE

The views expressed in this opinion are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of FORESIGHT Climate & Energy

Do you have a thoughtful response to the opinion expressed here? Do you have an opinion regarding an aspect of the global energy transition you would like to share with other FORESIGHT readers? If so, please send a short pitch of 200 words and a sentence explaining why you are the right person to deliver this opinion to opinion@foresightdk.com.

FORESIGHT  Contributor's picture

Thank FORESIGHT for the Post!

Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.

Discussions

Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on Nov 12, 2019 2:25 pm GMT

Changing the course of a sailboat requires coordinated action. The skipper announces the manoeuvre to the crew, turns the rudder and works with the crew to readjust the sails. To achieve the maximum cruising speed with the prevailing winds and currents, all sails need to be swiftly positioned at just the right angle.

Love the analogy-- it takes everyone on the same page and not a single piece out of line. We can't make the energy transition with partial commitments or incomplete actions. 

Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Nov 12, 2019 3:28 pm GMT

"As if coaxing a badly trimmed jib back on course, regulators can redesign regulation by linking the remuneration of network companies to outcomes consistent with the clean energy transition. This approach is called performance-based regulation (PBR)."

"Future electricity networks will be tasked with accommodating increasing amounts of variable renewable energy resources, active consumers and new sources of demand from the electrification of heat and transport."

Zsuzsanna, to date there is no evidence increasing amounts of variable renewable energy resources are consistent with a clean energy transition; thus, the approach described here would be better described as ideology-based regulation. Because variable wind and solar are 100% dependent upon dispatchable fossil fuel generation to be useful on a regional electricity grid, increasing them only increases dependency on the dirty sources of energy it is necessary to eliminate. The inability of Germany's Energiewende to meet 2020 emissions targets only confirms the folly of this approach - its failure to perform.

Carbon-free nuclear energy is recognized in every science-based assessment as being essential to a clean energy transition; here, it is conspicuously omitted. By eschewing a science-based solution, you are swiftly positioning all sails at just the right angle to steer your sailboat into a storm; by 2045, your vessel will be lying at the bottom of the sea.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »