The Energy Collective Group

This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.

9,751 Subscribers

Post

Rep. Shimkus, a Conservative Market Proponent, Recognizes "The Waste Issue" Imposes a Financial Risk and Cost on Nuclear Energy

During a recent House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing titled DOE Modernization: Advancing the Economic and National Security Benefits of America’s Nuclear Infrastructure there was an important exchange between Rep. Shimkus (R-IL) and Maria Korsnick, President and CEO of the Nuclear Energy Institute.

So you don’t have to scroll through 4 hours of video, I extracted the specific clip for you.

Rep. Shimkus, as a congressman who serves a district that is home to several nuclear plants, is well versed in the fact that nuclear plants are currently struggling in the restructured electricity markets. He has heard testimony from Ms. Korsnick to the effect that the markets are not fully valuing all of the attributes of the reliable, frequency stable, and emission free electricity nuclear plants provide.

He also recognizes that economic competitiveness in markets includes cost structures that can be influenced by external actors. He specifically recognizes that perceptions of financial risk and uncertainty can add significant costs and cost decisions that are not fully accounted for in financial statements.

A nuclear plant, for example, might be marginally profitable based on its current costs and its current revenues from electricity sales. If continued operation of that plant, however, carries an increasing risk of changes in rules or the need to make investments to address a growing inventory of used nuclear fuel, the plant owner might come to the conclusion that the amount of profit is insufficient to balance the financial risk of keeping the plant going.

Rop Shimkus asked Ms. Korsnick to address the costs that have been imposed on the nuclear industry by federal actions and inactions that have continued to impose risks and unquantifiable exposure to continued storage of “nuclear waste” in the form of used fuel.

Ms. Korsnick accurately described them nuclear waste issue as being a repetitional burden that has “imposed an albatross” on the neck of the nuclear industry. She clearly illustrates the communications difficulty of attempting to inform the public that we have safe and effective ways to handle the material. When the public hears that America has not solved the problem, despite 50 years or more of working on it, they legitimately get the impression that the solution must be really difficult–to the point of being virtually unsolvable.

Rep. Shimkus concludes the exchange with noting that the U.S. has addressed the issue and has a law on the books for a workable solution. It’s way past time to remove the costly albatross of “the waste issue” from the back of an overburdened industry that could offer substantial economic and environmental value if unshackled.

The post Rep Shimkus, a conservative market proponent, recognizes that “the waste issue” imposes a financial risk and cost on nuclear energy appeared first on Atomic Insights.

Original Post

Content Discussion

Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on February 14, 2018

Rod, no doubt Rep. Shimkus recognizes “the waste issue” imposes financial risk on the nuclear industry. What evidence do you have a man who has said climate change is nothing to worry about because

God had promised mankind through Noah that the earth would never again be destroyed by a flood…

and said

Now, do I believe in climate change? In my trip to Greenland, the answer is yes. The climate is changing. The question is more about the costs and benefits and trying to spend taxpayer dollars on something that you cannot stop versus the changes that have been occurring forever.

will support legislation to recognize nuclear’s value for fighting climate change?

Thorkil Soee's picture
Thorkil Soee on February 15, 2018

In the ongoing struggle to demonize nuclear “the waste problem” has turned to be a major issue.
I have tried to dig down under the surface and came out with something different.
See http://wp.me/p1RKWc-LC