The Energy Collective Group

This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.

9,874 Members

Post

Fracking Boom: Do We Want an Industrialized Landscape?

Last year I traveled to Western Pennsylvania to talk with people living next door to fracking operations. One man showed me the home he built for his wife and three sons on a quiet country road. They loved their rural lifestyle until representatives from an energy company showed up and said they had the right to drill for natural gas beneath the property. Soon a steady stream of trucks arrived with fracking fluids, giant generators, and other heavy equipment, and workers built a large drill pad next to the house. To top it off, the company stationed a security guard right in the middle of the family’s yard.

Many people I met on my trip said they felt displaced on their own property once energy companies move in. They aren’t alone.

America is in the midst of dramatic spike in oil and gas development. Aided by new fracking techniques, companies are drilling record-breaking amounts of land, including in our backyards and wild places. Once drill pads are built, these places become vulnerable to pollution, toxic spills, and permanent scarring.

America has a choice to make. We can stand by and watch energy companies industrialize our beloved landscapes. Or we can create smart safeguards that hold companies accountable for pollution and put sensitive places off limits.  But we have to decide quickly, before oil and gas companies make the choice for us.

The current scale of industrialization is astonishing: As of the end of 2011, at least 141 million acres of American land were under lease by 70 of the largest oil and gas companies. That’s an area the size of California and Florida combined and more than 6 percent of the country.

In Pennsylvania alone, companies have permits for more than 12,000 unconventional wells. Each well requires a web of infrastructure, making the industrial buildup even larger. The 949 natural gas drilling sites in Pennsylvania’s Washington County, for instance, resulted in more than 172 miles of new roads and 134 miles of new pipelines, according to the US Geological Survey.

fracking1.jpg

Much of this development is happening at breakneck speed. In 2007, the Bakken Reserve in North Dakota included 457 wells and produced 7 million barrels of oil. By 2012, oil and gas companies were drilling between 2,000 and 3,000 new wells a year. the state had 3,354 wells generating 127 million barrels of oil. The North Dakota Oil and Gas Commissions predict that 35,000 to 40,000 new wells will be drilled and fractured in the region over the next two decades. Already the oil patch is so heavily developed you can now see its lights and its natural gas flares from outer space.

But even as the amount of drilling accelerates, government safeguards have not kept pace. Companies have exempted themselves from bedrock environmental laws, and states have responded with a patchwork of weak standards and limited enforcement. Our communities and our health pay a steep price.

Just this week, the Los Angeles Times revealed that staff at the Environmental Protection Agency believed that methane released during drilling “and perhaps during the fracking process” may have resulted in “significant” damage to the quality of a drinking water source for 19 families in Dimock, Pennsylvania. Yet the agency never shared that possibility with residents nor made that interpretation public.

The Obama Administration, meanwhile, has failed to match its so-called All of the Above energy strategy with a plan for conserving America’s natural heritage. Between 2008 and 2012, 6 million acres were leased for energy development but the administration only protected 186,077 acres. President George W Bush preserved nearly 750,000 acres, and President Clinton preserved more than 9 million. As Former Secretary of Interior Bruce Babbitt said earlier this year, “Americans expect their public lands to supply more energy for today, but they also expect more parks, wilderness and open space for tomorrow.  And that balance, between development and land conservation, is not being maintained.”

America can do better than this. And we must. That is why NRDC opposes expanded fracking until effective standards are put in place—including safeguards that hold polluters accountable and put the most sensitive lands off limits to drilling. Right now we are calling on the Bureau of Land Management to strengthen the woefully inadequate standards it proposed for fracking on millions of acres of national forest, wildlife refuges, and other public lands. Click here to tell the BLM to protect our wild places from the hazards of fracking.

If we don’t act, oil and gas companies could alter our landscapes in ways we can’t repair. They could permanently despoil beloved wildlands like the stunning redrock canyons in Utah’s Book Cliffs. And they could bring toxic air and water pollution into our backyards and neighborhoods. Now is the time to decide what kind of landscape we want to leave our children.

Frances Beinecke's picture

Thank Frances for the Post!

Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.

Recent Comments

John Miller's picture
John Miller on July 31, 2013

There is little argument that natural gas production should be done in an environmentally sound and responsible manner.  It’s unfortunate that the gentleman you met was surprised and disappointed with the drilling near his residence.  This incident would not have occurred if he had not sold his rights or bought the property without understanding the mineral, oil & gas rights belonged to an independent 3rd party.  I had friends who brought property in the mountains and built nice cabins, but failed to note that the forest-timber rights belonged to someone else.  The logging company’s executing their rights many years later, had similar results as the gentleman you met experienced.  Unfortunately, there is little legal recourse one can take to stop the 3rd party from exercising their private property rights.

Like it or not, supporting people’s jobs, standards of living and the overall economy/energy security requires natural gas during the interim until some form of power storage needed to support high penetration levels of renewables such as variable wind/solar becomes a industrial/commercial reality.  In your post you noted that “172 miles of (production access) roads and 132 miles of (natural gas) pipelines” were built in Pennsylvania Washington County (alone) to support the recent expansion of unconventional natural gas production.  This development is once again unfortunate for those visually impacted, but is probably within the rights of the developers and has been done in compliance with all local permitting rules and regulations.

New industrial development impacts and NIMBY concerns should also be expected as renewables such as wind farms substantially increase in future years.  Wind farms also require large infrastructure construction including access roads and power lines that often have visual impacts opposed by those who reside near or adjacent these renewable power installations.  Unlike natural gas production platforms that are removed (and hopefully re-vegetated) after a couple-few years when the shale deposits are depleted, wind farms will be present for many decades.  Also unlike natural gas production facilities, the large state-of-art wind turbines (300 ft.+ height) are far more visible at large distances, can have noise issues for locals, and are hazardous to local bird and bat populations.  Yes, even renewables involve trade-offs that can negatively impact local residents, land-use and the native wildlife.

Paul O's picture
Paul O on July 31, 2013

Frances, It is short sighted and/or Hypocritical to speak of an industrialized landscape while ignoring towering, ugly, annoying windmills.

There is no species of windmill trees, this is in fact industrialization as well.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »