This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.

10,379 Members

Post

Is the End Really Nigh for Fossil Fuels? Or is the Future Simply Advanced Energy?

img-src-us-army-fort-dix-solar-panel-installation-222674-edited-1

Fossil Fuels Just Lost the Race Against Renewables,” reads the hyperbolic headline from Tom Randall, writing for Bloomberg Business. “This is the beginning of the end,” the subhead piles on. This report of the death of fossil fuel-powered electricity generation may be exaggerated. But looking closely at Randall’s article, the triumph of advanced energy seems even more of a sure thing.

The source of Randall’s hyperventilation (or the headline writer’s) is Bloomberg New Energy Finance founder Michael Liebreich’s keynote address at the annual BNEF New Energy Summit. There, Liebreich announced that, in new generating capacity installed globally in 2013, “clean” energy – including nuclear power, hydro, solar, wind, geothermal, biomass, and waste – edged out oil, coal, and natural gas, 143 GW to 141 GW. In BNEF’s forecast, the gap grows wider this year and beyond: 164 GW “clean” to 110 GW fossil in 2015; 279 GW “clean” to 64 GW fossil in 2030.  (Download the full presentation here.)

fossilfuelvscleanenergy

Source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance

“The electricity system is shifting to clean,” Liebreich declared. “Despite the change in oil and gas prices there is going to be a substantial buildout of renewable energy that is likely to be an order of magnitude larger than the buildout of coal and gas.”

In fact, the fossil fuel capacity projected to decline sharply over the coming years is mainly coal and oil; natural gas-fired capacity stays relatively steady in the BNEF projection, at roughly 50 GW per year through 2030. (See graph’s from Liebreich’s presentation.) AEE considers natural gas turbines “advanced energy,” as the cleanest and most efficient technology for fossil fuel power generation, as well as all of the sources Liebreich considers “clean.”

But the game changer, Liebreich rightly argues (and Randall correctly reports) is the steadily growing role of wind and solar in the new power mix, today and going forward. Randall also cites a scenario developed by the International Energy Agency under which solar, now accounting for less than 1 percent of electricity generation, could be the single largest power source worldwide by 2050.

The surge in these renewable energy sources is the result of a trend many years in the making. The cost of manufacturing and installing advanced energy technology has been dropping consistently. Solar and wind reaching cost parity with fossil fuels was one of the top 10 advanced energy news stories of 2014. Back then we wrote, “utilities and large energy users in the private sector started to choose advanced energy simply because it was cheaper.”

In October 2013, Xcel Energy submitted plans to the Colorado Public Utility Commission to buy electricity generated solar and wind—simply because it was the cheapest option available. A year later, in October 2014, a Deutsche Bank report concluded solar electricity is on track to be as cheap or cheaper than “average electricity-bill prices in 47 U.S. states.” And overall in 2014, 99 percent of new U.S. electricity capacity was from advanced energy: 53 percent from wind and solar, 43 percent from natural gas. 

Just this week, NPR featured a story from the Planet Money team on how solar has gotten “so cheap so fast.” The conclusion? Cheaper panels, faster installation, and innovative financing.  The story featured a SolarCity residential installation that took just four hours, compared to several days a few years ago. At the end of the day, the customer expects to save between $70 and $80 a month on his electrical bill.

Fossil fuels may or may not be dying. But the future of electricity generation belongs to advanced energy.

Discussions

Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Apr 24, 2015 3:30 pm GMT

Lexie, of course there’s a long way to go in the race to replace fossil fuels by 2100. But it’s encouraging to see GreenTech Media welcoming renewable nuclear energy into the fold of advanced, clean energy solutions which will be required to accomplish that feat.

Ripudaman Malhotra's picture
Ripudaman Malhotra on Apr 24, 2015 6:16 pm GMT

“This report of the death of fossil fuel-powered electricity generation may be exaggerated.”

The exaggerations only reduce the dredibility of the sources.  Electricity from fossil energy is dying, but it will take many decades before it disappears.  There are still many places in the world, where coal and gas may the preferred sources for new installations.  Instead of a “death” what we will see is a gradual fading away.

Josh Nilsen's picture
Josh Nilsen on Apr 25, 2015 1:32 am GMT

An even greater inflection point would be when humanity no longer generates the majority of it’s electricity from steam running a turbine.

Solar and wind are the first economic sources of electricity besides hydro that don’t require heat to turn turbines.

The era of fossil fuel based combustion is coming to an end.  (Besides rocket technology and that’s an exception as rocket fuel is a bit different.)

Fossil fuels are still perfectly good to use in fuel cells though!

Daniel Duggan's picture
Daniel Duggan on Apr 25, 2015 11:29 am GMT

Lexie, what capital investment did the householder make to save perhaps $70 – $80 per month? Would a better return on capital be achieved were the money invested in insulation?

Mark Heslep's picture
Mark Heslep on Apr 26, 2015 1:32 am GMT

“In other words, electricity generated by new fossil fuel plants in 2013 far exceeded the electricty generated by new clean energy plants in 2013.”

Yes.  The line between the energy “movement” and energy engineering grows ever sharper, mainly because the hyperbole of the movement is up, up, and away.

Mark Heslep's picture
Mark Heslep on Apr 26, 2015 2:07 am GMT

“…a scenario developed by the International Energy Agency under which solar, now accounting for less than 1 percent of electricity generation, could be the single largest power source worldwide by 2050.”

The IEA 2050 high solar scenario also requires, compared to the status-quo (roughly): a ten-fold increase in biomass combustion, a doubling  of hydro,  and several multiples of hard-to-find geothermal. IEA 2050 also imagines a collosal storage capacity, perhaps pumped hydro or battery based,  that will charge and ride through half the day, when in reality storage needs to ride through seasonal solar and wind outages. An IEA 2050 cold fusion scenario would have been as likely. 

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »