This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.

10,139 Members


E15: A Fuel Before Its Time

E15 – gasoline containing 15 percent ethanol that has EPA approval  – is one of those ideas that looks good on paper but seems headed for problems in the real world. API’s Bob Greco, director for downstream and industry operations, outlined some of them for reporters during a conference call:

  • Testing so far shows the higher concentration of ethanol would not be fully compatible with much of the dispensing and storage equipment the nation’s gas stations. A recent API review estimated half of the existing retail outlet equipment isn’t E15 compatible.
  • As a result, there could be damage to equipment, safety problems and potential environmental concerns at gas stations.
  • Difficulties with E15 getting into the market could erode public support for the nation’s renewable fuels program.
  • Refiners could face problems in the future, caught between satisfying federal requirements for blended fuels and the lack of a retail market for those fuels.

Greco said EPA’s E15 approval isn’t a mandate to sell and that the timing of its emergence into the marketplace will depend on clearing hurdles in individual states. Still, the concern is that E15 wasn’t thoroughly evaluated before it got EPA approval.

“The availability of biofuels for blending in gasoline is a good thing because of its favorable octane, and the industry supports a realistic and workable Renewable Fuels Standard.  In fact, more than 90 percent of all gasoline sold in the country has a 10 percent blend of ethanol.  But EPA has not done its homework before introducing E15 to America.  The Agency’s enthusiasm for E15 has clouded its judgment and led to approval of a fuel before adequate study has been done.”

Compatibility issues loom large, Greco said. “Even with vehicles the EPA says are compatible, automakers disagree,” he said. Last summer U.S. Rep. James Sensenbrenner of Wisconsin forwarded letters from car companies to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson that outline their E15 concerns. A sampling:

Ford: “Ford does not support the introduction of E15 into the marketplace for the legacy fleet. … Fuel not approved in the owner’s manual is considered misfueling and any damage resulting from misfueling is not covered by the warranty.”

Chrysler: “We are not confident that our vehicles will not be damaged from the use of E15. … The warranty information provided to our customers specifically notes that use of the blends beyond E10 will void the warranty.”

Honda: “Vehicle engines were not designed or built to accommodate the higher concentrations of ethanol.  … There appears to be the potential for engine failure.”

Ultimately, Greco said, consumers might become confused and ultimately could bear higher costs:

“Without a market for the higher ethanol blends, Congress’ biofuels mandate could result in higher compliance costs or production constraints that could place upward pressure on gasoline prices for consumers.”

One questioner asked whether NASCAR’s use of higher-ethanol fuel suggests E15 concerns are overstated. “I don’t know about you,” Greco said, “but I don’t drive a race car.”

Mark Green's picture

Thank Mark for the Post!

Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.


Edward Kerr's picture
Edward Kerr on May 5, 2012

Congress, in it’s infinite wisdom, has once again made a poorly informed mandate. Ethanol from corn has proven to be a “mixed blessing” at BEST. Wanting to become energy independent is a good idea in today’s world but E10, E15 or even E85 fails to advance independence. The amount of energy required to produce the ethanol all but wipes out any gain toward independence. Forcing up the price of food (over one half of all corn grown in the US goes to ethanol production) makes energy gains delusional.

IMHO Algal oil offers a much better (and history will prove me out on this assertion) option for energy independence. {In fact a well designed system would allow the US to become a MAJOR oil exporter, but that’s another argument…} It can be grown in many places that corn cannot. It can be refined into all of the liquid fuels that we depend on. It is carbon neutral, and mark my word. will be the oil of choice as soon as we can get some vested folks to “let go” of the bait.

Good post MArk,


Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »