This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.

10,194 Members


Countries need Domestic Solar Manufacturing, Not a Global Supplier!

Fossil fuel reserves are limited and are very close to depletion. The continuously shrinking reserves have given rise to energy cost, which stand to deprive more people (already 1 bn people live without electricity) of energy and spewed toxic fumes that have led to environmental degradation. Facing such a scenario, the world is on its way to adopt sustainable energy that can offer release from economic and environmental binds forged by fossil fuel usage. Solar continues to win the favour of the world as the best replacement of fossil fuels. However, what it can bring is more than sustainable energy for all; it can offer a chance to build a better economy and social structure within a country, which developing countries desperately need.

What The Opportunity Entails?

Solar energy transition is definitely an opportunity by every meaning. Why? Because energy and economy are interconnected. Therefore, with sustainable energy growth that saves money and satisfies energy demand will facilitate a better-formed, operational, and progressive economy. Solar energy transition can help countries by saving billions in fossil fuel imports, fostering industrial growth, creating jobs, bringing technological growth, and claiming the export market. Understanding the benefits, countries are increasing their share of renewable energy within energy generation mix.

Global average annual net capacity addition

Global average annual net capacity addition- (Image Curtsey: IEA)

We can easily see that opting for sustainable energy through solar and countrywide development are closely connected and follows each other. And data shows, solar PV project auctions in emerging markets rose by 4.5 times within 2013-17, therefore it is apparent that worldwide acceptance for solar certainly speaks in the favour of solarisation.

However, benefiting from such an opportunity depends only upon building solar manufacturing scale. For example, we can indicate the growth trajectory China has shown by supporting its solar manufacturing. China was able to become the global solar supplier, undercutting the market prices and claiming foreign markets due to its manufacturing scale. This has allowed countries like China to flourish while the opportunity of building one’s own solar manufacturing capacity is lost to developing countries.

Renewable energy capacity growth by country- IEA.JPG

Renewable energy capacity growth by country- (Image curtsey: IEA)

Why Developing Countries need Solar Manufacturing?

Why manufacture? Why not import cheaper solar components from foreign suppliers? Well, because although imported solar components like module may appear cheaper to buy, they are actually robbing a country of the chance to build manufacturing capacity and facilitate overall growth. Developed countries have understood that and acted towards protecting their solar industry. Developing countries like India have also shown great interest in solarisation and initiated policies like Make in India to protect and support domestic manufacturing. However, unfortunately these initiatives have fallen prey to importing solar due to its affordability (In FY 17-18 the expenditure stood at $3.8 billion).

solar consumption in India.JPG

Import vs domestic solar equipment usage in India- (Image curtsey: DGTR)

Domestic manufacturing initiatives like India’s ‘Make in India’ could have supported the country by bringing investment, encouraging entrepreneurs, building industrial setups, creating jobs and claiming the export market for lucrative sectors, like Solar (just like China did). However, lack of focus in favourable policy development, lack of investment in manufacturing, continuous importing solar, and recent issue of 25% safeguard duty imposition on domestic solar manufacturers (SEZ based) have resulted into something other than success for India.

As a result, we can see fall in solar demand in 2018, which is expected to affect 2019 as well.

India solar demand forecast.JPG

India’s solar demand forecast- (Image curtsey: MERCOM)

Therefore, without any hesitation we can state that developing countries like India need to build domestic manufacturing capacity to grow, because importing solar is just like spending money on fossil fuel. Sure, environment will be safe through solar import, but your economy will not.

Building Domestic Manufacturing Capacity Is a Necessity

If we take Indian solar industry scenario for example, we will see that despite the country’s intent to build solar capacity, its continued solar import rather than solar manufacturing has given ~80% domestic solar market share to foreign suppliers. This has reduced India’s solar export, limited job creation, industrial development, in overall sense of progress. Developed countries like US are trying to get out of this bind by imposing anti-dumping duties on China, Malaysia and other countries.

Losses of the Indian solar manufacturing Industry.JPG

Losses of the Indian solar manufacturing industry- (Image Curtsey: DGTR)

Way Forward

Solar stands as a great opportunity for developing countries to phase out fossil fuel and its growing expenses while transforming the country with industrial, social, and economic growth. And Initiatives like International Solar Alliance (ISA) that offer technology exchange options, financial support, strategic support are also here to make the situation even better. However, developing countries like India must invest and focus in domestic manufacturing to avail these benefits. Prioritizing domestic manufacturing can afford developing countries the best possible opportunity to become energy self-reliant, creating jobs, trade relations, and economic stability. However, the time is now to solve internal issues and invest in solar manufacturing to see the results.

Gyanesh Chaudhary's picture

Thank Gyanesh for the Post!

Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.


Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Feb 18, 2019 5:51 pm GMT

"Solar continues to win the favour of the world as the best replacement for fossil fuel energy...Therefore, with sustainable energy growth that saves money and satisfies energy demand..."

Gyanesh, it sounds like this was written by someone who never had to rely on intermittent solar electricity. Honestly - would you be satisfied with electricity which was available less than half of every day?

Nathan Wilson's picture
Nathan Wilson on Feb 19, 2019 4:53 am GMT

Yes, solar is very popular with the general public.  But it is not winning so much praise from technically-minded energy policy groups.  

A recent report by the OECD looked at deep de-carbonization options.  It found that using today's technology (i.e. no carbon-capture for fossil fuel plants, and limited options for hydro growth), nuclear is the cheapest way to achieve 90% reduction in the electricity's CO2-intensivity (i.e. targeting 50 g_CO2/kWh).  In fact, they found that electricity costs grow faster than the renewable penetration (i.e. it gets worse and worse, the more renewables are included).

Of course that will depend on the renewable resource quality of each country, but when they ran their simulations assuming that renewables would achieve cost reductions to make them much cheaper than nuclear (i.e. a 60% drop in the cost of PV), renewables still only achieved about a 30% penetration, with the rest going to nuclear and fossil gas.

Unlike many others, this study actually tried to estimate the external costs of using variable renewables (i.e. for things like new transmission, running fossil fuel plants at low capacity factor, curtailment, and energy storage), as well as quantifying the diminishing value of renewables as their penetration increases.

For country grids that don't have much fossil gas to backup the renewables (like the coal dominated grids in India and China).  The cost penalty is much higher since renewables+coal costs more than coal alone. Plus gas-fired plants are the only type which can remain cost effective when run at low capacity factor.

The result is that even though enthusiasts tell us how cheap renewables have become, China and India are still building coal-fired power plants as fast as they can, windpower penetration is still below 5% in each, and solar PV penetration is even lower.  Oh yes, and each is adding nuclear plant capacity at about the same rate as wind or solar (when corrected for capacity factor).

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »