The Energy Collective Group

This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.

9,882 Members

Post

California’s move to cut utility gas leaks is a critical part of moving towards a low carbon future

By Tim O'Connor

As shown by the recent special report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, emissions from fossil fuel combustion in California and elsewhere present dire consequences for the planet. This means California, like the rest of the world, must take real steps now to shift toward a low carbon future.

Similar to many other developed economies, California has a vast oil and gas delivery infrastructure that is integrated into its modern way of life – a system that supports the combustion of fossil fuels in nearly every corner of society. As a result, making dramatic shifts toward a carbon neutral economy as envisioned in a recent executive order by Governor Brown will take a lot of investment. While this investment is underway, it’s appropriate to also make sure the system that delivers energy to homes and businesses is as environmentally benign as possible.

On Thursday, the California Public Utilities Commissions is expected to make a major step toward this goal when it officially approves first-of-their-kind leakage reduction plans for the state’s gas utilities and gas storage providers. Through implementation, utilities like Southern California Gas, Pacific Gas and Electric, and San Diego Gas and Electric will cut leakage and venting across the gas delivery systems they own and operate, resulting in a gas infrastructure that is safer for the planet and for customers.

Development and approval of the gas utility leak plans is the result of a 2014 law, SB 1371, that requires utilities to use best practices to find, fix, and prevent leaks on their systems. The law, and subsequent leak plans, are significant because the main component of gas leakage is methane, a potent greenhouse gas that, in aggregate, is responsible for about 25 percent of man-made warming.

Emissions estimates for gas leakage in California show utilities release more methane pollution through gas leaks and venting every single year than was emitted during the major gas leak at Aliso Canyon that caused the evacuation of tens of thousands of people in Northern Los Angeles for nearly four months between 2015 and 2016. Once these plans are implemented, the state will reduce 16 to 18 percent of its utility methane emissions by 2020, and 40 percent by 2030.

Reduction of methane from the state’s gas infrastructure is welcome news at a critical time. Although the Trump administration has pulled the federal government back from cutting methane pollution, reducing emissions from oil and gas equipment remains one of the cheapest, fastest, and easiest ways to make a dent in the world’s climate pollution. In fact, the International Energy Agency estimates we can cut the global methane footprint of the oil and gas sector in half at zero net cost simply by implementing existing technologies.

Among the efforts that will be included in the plans approved by the Commission are changes to policies, operations and equipment used to manage the overall gas system.  These changes are required pursuant to 26 individually identified best practices, including:

  • Increasing inspection frequency – finding leaks faster
  • Improving detection ability – finding more leaks with better technology
  • Repairing more leaks – not letting them sit around
  • Prioritizing repairs – fixing largest leaks first
  • Preventing leaks from happening using predictive tools
  • Stopping purposeful venting using compression and scheduling
  • Getting rid of equipment designed to leak, like high bleed pneumatics
  • Reporting and tracking leaks and total lost gas year-over-year
  • Expanding public outreach and preventing dig-ins
  • Expanding worker training on leak reduction

Natural gas utility companies traditionally have plans in place focused on reducing gas leaks that pose a risk of explosion or fire. But utilities have rarely prioritized repair of non-explosive leaks, even though these emissions have a significant impact on climate change. One of the hallmarks of this new policy is that it requires companies to repair and prevent both.

Once authorized, these changes identified in the utility leak reduction plans will result in over $300 million in new expenditures by gas utilities, but will also result in reduction in the amount of gas lost to the atmosphere, an improvement in overall system management and safety, and faster responsiveness to natural disasters like earthquakes. These wide-reaching benefits, coupled with benefits to the climate make the Commission’s action to improve them very important.

California is one of the first states to implement this type of climate intervention from gas delivery, but given the outsized impact methane has on the climate and the vast range of solutions capable of minimizing leaks, we don’t expect it to be the last.

California’s move to cut utility gas leaks is a critical part of moving towards a low carbon future
Click To Tweet

EDF Energy Exchange's picture

Thank EDF Energy for the Post!

Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.

Recent Comments

No discussions yet. Start a discussion below.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »