This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.

10,057 Members


Automation key to supply and demand


Last month I succeeded in provoking considerable discussion around the notion that the power industry needs to wring efficiencies from the grid, not just hector customers to change their behavior – “rationing,” as one of my colleagues has put it. And I suggested that one way to do that is by deploying advanced sensors and controls – i.e., intelligence – throughout the grid on the utilities’ side of the meter. Today I want to develop that idea further.

I acknowledge a couple of things that I glossed over in my prior post before plunging ahead with today’s thesis. First, some smart meters can sense power on/off, voltage, phase angle and temperature at end points to help enable smart grid benefits. But not all meters do this, and many that do are not being fully utilized. Second, demand response programs are reducing peak demand and total energy consumption. I just don’t believe that will be enough; a smarter grid can do so much more, including better demand response techniques and results.

The industry has pretty thoroughly and effectively automated centralized generation and transmission. However, it has become clear that we need new solutions for the future beyond adding more conventional, central station generation and bulk transmission corridors. We must focus on an entirely different kind of grid.

We cannot reconfigure the grid overnight. There’s no way to make a quantum leap from a century-old paradigm to, say, the Galvin Electricity Initiative’s vision of a loosely connected collection of microgrids. But, whatever the ultimate grid will look like, a smarter grid will better enable us to cope while we make the transition.

Even if we could somehow continue to construct and operate the same kind of grid that we have had for the past 100 years, a smarter grid will substantially improve reliability, efficiency, security, power quality and customer service. The need is even greater with the new realities of the 21st century. A much smarter and more resilient grid is necessary to integrate new kinds of power sources such as wind power and distributed generation as well as supply new kinds of loads such as plug-in hybrid electric vehciles (PHEVs), electric vehicles (EVs), and customer-side-of-the-meter, automated energy management systems.

A smarter grid will have substantial benefits both in day-to-day, normal operations of the existing grid. Intelligent electronic devices (IEDs) with capabilities more like smart phones than most of today’s smart meters and phasor measurement units (PMUs) with capabilities far beyond SCADA, as well as other advanced telecom and information technologies, will enable real-time monitoring and control of the grid. This will allow utilities to, for example, optimize voltage throughout the grid, in turn reducing demand and total energy consumption, and enhance power quality for customers. The same goes for harmonics, electromagnetic interference and other power quality issues. Real-time monitoring and control of individual devices such as transformers, voltage regulators and even power lines themselves can improve performance and actually extend asset life. Real-time monitoring and control can also facilitate the avoidance of unexpected faults and failures, which is known as distribution fault anticipation.

In emergency conditions caused by “acts of God,” such as the derechos (high, straight line winds sometimes accompanying severe thunderstorms) that raked the  Eastern states at the tail end of June, advanced outage management systems (OMS), in concert with distributed sensors and controls, can substantially improve utility response and restoration of service as well as communications with customers and employees. The same goes for service interruptions caused by equipment failure, accidents or sabotage.

Obviously, weather-related emergencies like the derechos will cause the industry to analyze the costs to utilities, consumers and society of power outages in order to evaluate the feasibility of system hardening (e.g., putting power lines underground, more aggressive vegetation management, distributed backup generation, microgrids, advanced load shedding and restoration schemes). The historical data that will be available from a smarter grid will allow utility analysis to be more accurate, system planning to be more effective and system operations to be more efficient and reliable. The same goes for dealing with the physical security of the grid in the face of threats from unintentional or intentional human actions.

Finally, let’s turn to the customer who can obviously benefit from intelligence and automation on his/her side of the meter so that dynamic pricing and demand response programs do not require as much expertise, time or effort. This will go beyond smart meters and even smart thermostats to include distributed monitoring and control throughout the premises connected through home area networks. Ultimately, monitoring and control will be embedded into appliances. Continuous rapid improvement in electronics, telecommunications and information technologies make it inevitable that the customer’s side of the meter will be fully automated, and not just to control energy costs.

Can we do any less on the utilities’ side of the meter? Unfortunately, the electric utility industry is lagging in the application of advanced electronics, telecommunications and information technologies. Is it possible that others may step in to fill the gap if utilities don’t?

By adding distributed intelligence and automation to the grid and providing end-use customers with the same, we can better cope with the deficiencies of the existing infrastructure, making most efficient and effective use of current, centralized power while setting the stage for the evolution of what Bob Metcalfe has called the “Enernet.” But that’s a topic for another day.  

Image: Digital Power Meter via Shutterstock

Steven Collier's picture

Thank Steven for the Post!

Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.

Steven Collier's picture
Steven Collier on August 16, 2012


Thanks for taking the time to read and comment. I agree that the cost of distribution automation is a barrier, especially when the economic justifications are largely based upon today's circumstances and wholesale power costs, not the true future costs (and grid failures) that are being avoided by a smarter grid. The incentives have been somewhat misaligned, putting all the eggs in the demand response basket. And the demand response programs are largely relegated to voluntary behavioral change based upon complex pricing options and data displays, not automated systems in tight integration with a fully automated distribution grid.

Perhaps the biggest barrier is the reluctance of the industry to recognize that the fundamentals of the industry are changing, that we can no longer rely on a single monolithic, centralized power grid based upon economies of scale that no longer exist and a cost plus monopoly franchise social contract that will erode as decentralized disintermediaries (e.g., Solar City, National Power Partners, Direct Energy LP, etc.) increasingly define the market.

On a side note, I think that there are some distribution system executives that are recognizing not only the necessity, but the tremendous benefits of a truly smart grid. A couple of weeks ago, I made a presentation to an electric cooperative board of directors and executive team. The CEO came up to me afterward and said, "Our SCADA and smart meters are showing us something about our distribution system.  What we thought was a very sharp knife is actually dull and pitted.  And we are only just beginning to understand it."

Steve C

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »