Clean Power Professionals Community

This special interest group is where you can bring thoughts and ideas on renewable energy. Visit the Generation Network to share your views on traditional generation technologies.

39,858 Subscribers

Article Post

Another assault on clean power by Trump

It’s truly unfortunate that the environmental movement has become the exclusive domain of the American left. There is nothing more intuitive than wanting to protect one’s natural surroundings. Everybody wants their kids to be drinking clean water and breathing clean air. Lest we forget, it was Richard Nixon, hardly a dyed-in-the-wool liberal, who set up the Environmental Protection Agency.

Forty years later, however, things are very different indeed. A cultural shift over the past couple decades has led to a situation where one side of the political spectrum has become entirely contemptuous of environmentalism, dismissing virtually any concerns about the environment as left-wing propaganda.

Donald Trump has taken this worldview to the extreme. He has dismissed climate change as a “hoax” cooked up by the Chinese and appointed an oil industry lackey to head the agency that Nixon set up four decades ago.

It’s one thing to believe that climate change is not an emergency or that the government doesn’t need to interfere in the market to promote green technologies. But Trump is now interfering in the market on behalf of fossil fuels, even when it doesn’t make any sense economically.

While Trump’s attempt to save the coal industry via an obscene proposal to guarantee it profits was thankfully thwarted by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, he has since moved ahead with another counter-productive policy: levying major tariffs on imported solar panels.

U.S. manufacturers are lauding the move as a way to protect American jobs from cheaper imports, but the overall effect will harm American consumers, workers, not to mention the environment.

While Bloomberg reports on a number of solar industry players who say they are not concerned that the move will have long-lasting damage on the expansion of solar, there seems to be little doubt that it will slow the growth of clean power. For instance, ClearView Energy Partners estimates that the cost of major utility-scale projects will rise 10 percent as a result of the move.


Gordon Ziegler's picture
Gordon Ziegler

There is a new model of science known as the Unified Field Theory and the Unified Particle Theory. This model of science is one that Einstein tried for thirty years to discover, but was unable.
Within this new science are the discoveries of clean energy.
Clean energy comes from a particle accelerator called the Electrino Fusion Power Reactor (EFPR). This is done through the fusion of the half particles of electrons (semions), in a particle accelerator.
When electron semions are fused, they switch from matter to antimatter and vice versa; so, when the half particles are fused, antimatter will be produced (negatrons), which will collide with the matter (protons and neutrons) in the walls of the accelerator, annihilating one nucleon each reaction, and producing a burst of gamma rays. The gamma rays are collected by photovoltaic cells and converted into electricity.
In the initial design, one accelerator would produce 1,880 megawatts of power for less than 50 million dollars as compared to the Grand Coulee dam which produces 2,000 megawatts, or a modern nuclear reactor which can produce up to 1,250 megawatts and cost over ten billion dollars. Currently there are 100 nuclear reactors in the United States producing 100,000 Megawatts of power. It would take 54 Electrino Fusion Power Reactors to replace all nuclear facilities in the United States.
Electrino Fusion energy is 1000 times more efficient than a nuclear reactor, with no carbon emissions or radioactive wastes. It can use virtually anything for fuel and can go one-hundred years before refueling is needed. It would be easiest, however to use Copper for annihilation fuel.