This special interest group is where you can bring thoughts and ideas on renewable energy. 

40,667 Members


2019 Community Power Scorecard

MethMehr - Dreamstime

The Institute for Local Self-Reliance has released its Community Power Scorecard, an assessment of state policies that encourage clean local energy development.

The top ranking states, in order, are Massachusetts, California, New York and Illinois. Not surprisingly, these same states are also moving ahead rapidly with other renewable energy initiatives including storage incentives and policies that facilitate the development of microgrids.

The Institute for Local Self-Reliance bases its power scorecard on an evaluation of nine individual policy initiatives that contribute to clean local energy including:

  • Customer friendly net metering
  • Simplified interconnection rules to encourage distributed renewables
  • Requires utility procurements to include renewables
  • Allows shared (community) renewably energy
  • Community Choice Energy (or Community Choice Aggregation) allowing communities to pick their own energy suppliers
  • Property assessed clean energy (PACE) financing for residential and commercial buildings
  • Allows communities to go further than state’s building energy efficiency codes
  • Has a standard contract or feed-in tariff for renewables

Twenty-five states earned flunking scores with the five biggest losers including Kansas, North Dakota, South Dakota, Alabama and Louisiana, coming in dead last. These state have but one policy each that promotes clean local energy.

About HOMER Energy

This content was provided by HOMER Energy, the developer and distributor of the HOMER software, the global standard for energy modeling tools that analyze solar-plus-storage microgrids and other distributed energy projects. HOMER software determines engineering and economic feasibility by simulating complex off-grid and grid-tied distributed energy systems that combine conventional and renewable power, storage, and load management. Learn more at, and read more content like this at

Lili Francklyn's picture

Thank Lili for the Post!

Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.


Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on May 9, 2019 9:31 am GMT

Those leading the way (as well as those coming up from behind) are no surprise at all for anyone who keeps an eye on state-level clean power initiatives. That said, these kind of grades are immensely valuable for laying out the true difference behind the high performers and the laggards. In particular, it's interesting to note how many of the failing states are directly next to a state with an A or a B-- shows that geography and demographics aren't make or break, rather it's about taking the initiative

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »