It's easy to contribute articles, article proposals, commentary and analysis and be published online through Energy Central!
Sound interesting? Contact the editor for more information.
Asian development bank report projected India's total energy consumption at 1279 MTOE by 2030. Per capita electricity consumption for India stood at 631 Kwh as compared to US per capita of more than 13338 by 2007. With targeting an ambitious 8 to 10% GDP growth in the coming years its per capita consumption also should increase accordingly. During my research on this paper, interestingly I found that it is not the lack of resources in our hands hampering our growth, but it is the lack of initiatives, improper proceedings and poor implementations done at the central and state levels that led to our downfall (For example The Electricity Act 2003 bill was passed way back some concepts like "open access" is yet to be practiced in some of the states like Bihar).
This paper presents the strategies to be adopted with the implication of an Integrated and co-coordinated framework, which would definitely take to the Path of Energy Security.
The Ills:
Coal: Coal as a fuel accounts for nearly 55% of the total energy need of India. The principal carbon asset is been relegated to political inattention and a rock solid monopolistic ideologies. Private investment is moving at a very slow pace even after the enactment of Coal Mines Amendment Bill, 2000. Coal India Limited with 95% of mines under its belt hardly gives any room for others private players to get in. Without an independent regulator, the entire sector is plagued with low productivity, Investment shortages, shoddy management and poor labor relations.
Oil and Natural Gas sector: India's foreign import dependency on oil is to grow to 85% by 2012. Government again failed to pilot the Petroleum Bill, 2002. The New Exploration and Licensing Policy, which came in 1999 with lucrative incentives, is of moderate success. Dismantling of Administrative Pricing Mechanism was done in 2002 but still, government is reluctant to cede control over pricing. The demand for natural gas could go up to 160-170 MMSCMD over the next five years. Open access could be introduced in phase after framing appropriate regulation, which could stimulate a competitive environment. Both these sectors are in need of an empowering and independent regulator.
Power sector: The aspects given in the Electricity Act 2003 like open access (section 42), competitive market (section 66), etc doesn't seems to happen in actual practice, which resulted in financial closure for about 15000 MW for IPP's and in turn resulted in slow progress of reforms. By 2008 alone the total power subsidy to the states stands at 13876 crores which nearly cover a whopping 1% of our GDP. With an energy shortage of 7.7% and peak shortage of 12.3%, the ambition of electrifying India by 2012 with more than Rs. 9 trillion as emphasized in National Electricity Policy (section 3) remains as a question mark.
What is an Integrated Energy Strategy?
The concept of Integrated Energy Strategy is not the one that requires a centralized action, but certainly involves a system of coordinated decision-making and actions that bring various energy activities into a common framework, which is represented, in the table below.
Why an Urgent Need for India?
Only at the time of formulation of five-year plan, the sector looks as a whole, rest of the times it acts as an individual sector even if one's strategy hampers other. For example, the power sector reforms are not only hampered because of its modernized technologies like FBT, but also because of lack of coal and gas supplies. Recently a 500MW power project jointly owned by NTPC and Sail power co. limited came to closure because of lack of coal supply. The coal sector also suffers by not getting the return from the power sector, because of lack of revenue collection in the power sector. Hence it is high time for India to adopt an "Integrated Energy Strategy", which is been already employed successfully in countries like USA, Australia, U.K. etc.
Formation of National Energy Companies Association (NECA):
There is a need for direct involvement of the players with the government in framing the strategies. So far it has been very less. The earlier discussions clearly underline the need for an apex body that can coordinate and promote the energy sector. In the Indian context, his has been successfully demonstrated in the software industry by NASSCOM. So, all the players in the energy sector should join hands and form an association called "National Energy Companies Association" or NECA. It could also have its members for advising from leading consultancies, research firms, and also some senior government experts. NECA's vision should be to make the sector globally competitive and make India to achieve its vision 2020 in energy.
Some important functions of NECA include:
The concept of energy and its conservation has to be taken out of the ivory tower where it is ensconced and popularized at the street level. The government is already promoting it through Bureau of Energy Efficiency, which initiated the Renewable Energy Development Agencies, operating in 3 states but it has to be formed in all the states. Massive advertisement campaigns should be held through all media's, so that a layman would come to know about Energy conservation benefits. To inculcate it among the children, the government should make a compulsory subject of "Energy and its Importance in schools". On over all, a mass awareness energy program should be formed and promoted from city to village levels.
Conclusion:
1) http://www.powermin.nic.in/
References
2) http://www.coalmin.nic.in/
3) http://www.petroleum.nic.in/
4) http://www.eia.doe.gov/
5) http://www.cea.nic.in/
| Date | Comment |
|
Harry Valentine 11.18.09 |
Excellent article. It highlights several energy issues that urgently need to be addressed in India. It is sad that the outdated policies and standards of the Government of India are a serious hinderance to India generating more electric power. There would be merit for the Government of India to get itself right out of certain segments of the Indian energy sector altogether. India has incredible potential for future development in energy generation. India has hundreds, if not several thousand entrepreneurs who could make a phenomenal contribution insofar as generating more cost-competitive electrical power is concerned. Except that India's government needs to get out of their way.
|
|
Dr W M Siva Kumar 11.21.09 |
In India, with the existing democratic setup, it is next to impossible to avoid political clout. Focus shall be on selecting the right people for heading the utilities/organisations, apart from selecting the right minister for energy. For Example most of the SEBs are headed by the IAS officers not by technocrats, and to be specific in KArnataka, Minister for energy is no way concerned with the subject, where as the minister for medical education is an electrical engineer, due to this we often see the irrelevant and absurd reports or statements on power situation. Though the electricity policies on NCE are existing, due to bureaucratic hurdles we see no or little progress on this front. Dr W M Sivakumar Former Adviser IT BBMP./ 21-11-2009
|
|
Ramanathan Menon 11.25.09 |
I join hands with Dr. Harry Valentine and Dr. Siva Kumar. Whatever they had said were the right things. In India, many people don't know what is solar energy. Many believe that the heat from the Sun is a God's gift to dry their clothes and firewood!! The Government of India spends millions of rupees for publicity but in the wrong medias. They don't advertise in thousands of energy and environment magazines available in the country. Most of the ads are released on vested interests and the whimsies and fancies of the Ministers and the bureaucrats. I thank the author Mr.Bharathi Seeni for not only explaining the problems but also suggesting the right solutions to overcome India's energy crisis to certain extent.
|
|
Alok Misra 11.25.09 |
In the first place author is from a Software co and not from a utility.Secondly there has been a history of Phenomenal power development in India so far and what you see in power plants is not the only power India Produces. There are thousands of generating sets across India which also produce power.Thirdly I do not believe he knows how Indian Power sector is currently organized .or How planning is done at the Planning commission level. Each and every country in the World has a integrated Energy plan and so has India. More so us because we have a planning commission- it is their job. Before writing this article he should have gone thru Government documents. Fourthly his contention that All power producers should form an association does not go by the facts.Has he checked whether such associations exist or not.? As regards the Hydro does he know that what are the environmental problems ? I find the article does go somewhere but not very informative at all.It is certainly not of depth on this issue. India has electricity as a state subject like Education.It can atbest be a con-current subject with the center Center has to only act as a facilitator.NTPC/ NHPC/ Atomic power etc produce power under centrel control. All state have their own policies on Electricity- some even go to the extent of giving electricity to farmers for free. They never compensate electricity boards suffecietly. Thus Electricity boards are always hard pressed. Another is massive theft of energy which has totalled some 12 billion dollars since 1991.This has driven Electricity boards to bad economics who keep on demanding energy tariff raise and saying they can not control the theft. Who is stealing the Electricity and tempering the meters ?There can be various views on this subject but political patronage and transferring those officeers to punishment posting who carry out theif catching religously is not uncommon. No full scale privatisation is the answer.Nor Full scale govt is the answer. Indians have yet to learn that Electricity is produced and it should be outside political ambit if it has to be obtained regularly and at right prices. But who will speak this out?
|
|
Don Hirschberg 11.25.09 |
Alok Misra commented, "Before writing this article he (the author) should have gone thru Government documents." Considering some of the convolutions mentioned above, if he did so, when could we expect an article?
|
|
Don Hirschberg 11.27.09 |
I apologize for going a bit off topic, but we are almost on the eve of Kyoto II in Copenhagen and it didn’t get a mention. Data in the article tells us the US uses 21 times as much electricity per capital as India. OK, ok, maybe the ratio is a little less because of non-utility generation by those who need electricity now, not in some never- never land future. It is no secret that India has severe energy problems. Although I can read news articles that tell me that 300 to 400 million Indians have no electric service whatsoever the media goes stone deaf and ignores this, yet continues to write stories about India’s need to reduce CO2 emissions to help save the planet. Although it was not so reported I suspect Hillary Clinton on her recent visit when she leaned on India to reduce CO2 was actually told, “Go to hell. When you decrease CO2 per capita to even close to India’s low rate then we can talk. Otherwise, bug-off.” India like China needs more coal. They will get and use more coal.
|
|
Don Hirschberg 11.29.09 |
When it comes to facing up to facts it seems everyone disappears. Those touting carbon reduction go deaf and blind but continue to prattle on as if politicians and “environmentalists” can reduce fossil fuel usage. Take coal: Remember the Kyoto Protocol? In 1990 we used 3.46 billion Mtons of coal. In 2008 we used 5.81 billion Mtons. That’s not less, it’s 68% more! And we are also burning more oil and gas. But who tells you this and the media churns out stories telling us how wonderful it is that good citizens can reduce CO2 and save the world though enlightened policies Baloney. When will it be recognized publically by politicians that our problem is too many people?
|
|
Malcolm Rawlingson 12.5.09 |
Good comments Don, There is so much baloney written about Carbon Dioxide gas. As the recent University of East Anglia "ClimateGte" debacle clearly shows most of it is concocted science designed to achieve political ends. China adds a 2000 MW coal plant every WEEK to its grid. Use of coal is going up not down. To some extent I agree that perhaps there are too many people but what it really boils down to is a mismatch of available energy to the numbers of people. As I have said many times on this forum there is only one energy source capable of fulfilling the energy needs of the existing people on this planet and whether you like it or not it is nuclear power. The use of coal in such large and increasing quantities is causing significant damage. The carbon dioxide emissions issue is greatly exagerrated however the damage and deaths caused by mining and transporting the material are very real. Thousands of mining deaths a year - not probable deaths from some phoney computer mode but real people getting killed daily. Nuclear energy is by far the least damaging to the planet and can easily meet the worlds total energy requirements. The quicker that inescapable fact is realised the sooner we can properly address the energy requirements of the world. While it is easy to quickly conclude that there are perhaps too many people - what would be the solution - kill off a billion or so a year? We already seem to be quite happy to let the African subcontinent starve to death while we use up the worlds corn supplies to make "biofuel". With the recently concluded agreement between Canada and India on nuclear energy co-operation I am sure we can assist in meeting India's energy needs without the use of coal or imported oil. malcolm
|
|
Don Hirschberg 12.5.09 |
The usual argument I get about the world having too many people is that since no solution is offered there must not be a problem. Huh? It’s as if brains are wired to think problems and solutions are part of some vast zero-sum game. Well real problems are not like those in an algebra textbook with corresponding answers given in the back of the book. Do billions of people lack electricity by choice? They don’t have electricity because they don’t have and never have had and likely never will have the money to build coal-burning generating plants. Now it is seriously proposed to solve their problem by building nuclear plants at many times the cost of a coal fueled plant. Huh? The world became overpopulated during my lifetime: From 2 billion to nearly 7 billion. Despite the Holocaust, Stalin, Mao, and the worst wars in history. Until a thousand years ago world population had never been over abut 0.3 billion. Something like 17,000 children die every day (yes, I mean per day) from diarrhea as a result of bad drinking water. A few drops of laundry bleach at almost no cost could drastically reduce the number of these deaths. Do you think the world would be better off saving these 17,000 per day? I have been asking this question for years and nobody has ever wanted to respond. 17,000, that’s like having about six 9/11’s every day.
|
|
Don Hirschberg 12.6.09 |
Something like 17,000 children die every day (yes, I mean per day) from diarrhea as a result of bad drinking water. A few drops of laundry bleach at almost no cost could drastically reduce the number of these deaths. Do you think the world would be better off saving these 17,000 per day? I have been asking this question for years and nobody has ever wanted to respond. 17,000, that’s like having about six 9/11’s every day. Once again no comments. I have been using 17,000. I thought this was bad enough but I see where the number could well be even greater. Few of us pay any attention to numbers. We grieve when we hear 7 American soldiers were killed in Afghanistan. Yet we pay absolutley no attention that 50-100 Americans were killed that same day in cars.
|
It's easy to contribute articles, article proposals, commentary and analysis and be published online through Energy Central!
Sound interesting? Contact the editor for more information.