It's easy to contribute articles, article proposals, commentary and analysis and be published online through Energy Central!
Sound interesting? Contact the editor for more information.
Only your utility company can determine what is "core" or "non-core" in your meter-to-cash processing. However, if you determine that bill print processing is non-core and you elect to evaluate outsourcing this function, this article provides suggestions on how to approach this evaluation.
This is not an inclusive list, but rather a high level overview of key items that I believe should not be overlooked and that will help your company make an informed decision on your processing strategy. Many of these items do not get the level of attention they deserve during the evaluation and tend to be the cause of "surprises" that arise later.
Preparation
A critical initial step in preparing to conduct a bill print processing evaluation is to have a good understanding of your current processing.
Having this information will facilitate your evaluation and will reduce the potential for surprises that may arise later in your evaluation process.
Request for Proposal
Most utility companies will issue a Request for Proposal (RFP) document as part of their due diligence in conducting a bill print processing evaluation. Since utility companies have been using the RFP approach for decades, this article will not go into the details on how to handle the RFP process or how to establish your evaluation team.
One of the major objectives of your RFP should be to learn how the respective bill print outsourcing vendors handle their business. Identify each vendor's standard processing procedures and strong points. Use this information to determine if this processing option will bring value to your bill print processing.
It is suggested that your RFP be developed with two separate documents: (1) Business -- operational and technical and (2) Financial -- cost of services. Using this approach will help your evaluation team first to focus on the operational and technical evaluation of the bill print outsourcing vendors and to rank the vendors by how well they will meet your requirements. Following this, your team can evaluate the cost of using each vendor and then rank them by cost. Comparing the two ranking lists will facilitate building a short list of two or three vendors that have earned the next level of evaluation.
Business RFP: A proven approach for the Business RFP document is to follow the flow of bill print processing. The following lists key items to consider by each processing step.
It is suggested that the Business section of your RFP is not just made up of "yes/no" type questions. Instead, use questions that require the vendor to answer your questions with an explanation of their processing procedures. How they build their responses will give your evaluation team a better understanding of how thorough and efficient the vendor's standard business practices are.
A RFP comparison methodology will need to be established. This will use a weighting or priority scheme assigned to each RFP question. Additionally, a scoring scheme should be developed to grade or rate the vendor's response to each RFP question. Combining the weighting and scoring schemes will allow your team to build a total score for each vendor indicating how well they will meet your requirements.
Financial RFP: The Financial RFP document that accompanies the Business RFP document should require the vendors to explain their pricing methodology. You should provide your actual volumes by bills, notices and letters to allow the vendors to provide a complete proposal. Vendors should also be required to specify any non-daily charges, such as, fees related to setup, training, inventory handling, etc.
Summary
A bill print processing evaluation is a valuable tool to help your company make an informed decision on the direction to take for your customer bill print processing.
Critical factors that lead to a successful evaluation are:
As your company evaluates outsourcing your bill print processing, it should be stressed that electing this approach creates a partnership between your company and the vendor. Typically, these arrangements are for a three to five year term. Since this is a mission critical processing element in your customer bill delivery strategy, a strong working relationship with the vendor is important.
Earlier in this article it was stated that this is not an inclusive list, but rather a high level overview of key items that I believe should not be overlooked when conducting a bill print processing evaluation. Having the appropriate information will help your company make an informed decision on your processing strategy.
| Date | Comment |
|
MURTHY HK 4.1.11 |
Hello James, Thanks for the great level of details covered above for a key topic which gets overlooked by everyone in the industry most of time i have seen. Some more points from my view is Infrastructure - Understand the possible ways of data transfer and feasibility from source to destination and costs involved in terms of Capex and Opex. Ex:- SFTP,MPLS Dedicated Links etc The links capacity should take into consideration of the peak loads in a year,latency involved during the transmission etc Reconciliation Process - This is one of the key in the overall end-to-end process to understand how the info flows back and forth for updating to source systems so that the core system user aware of original bills delivery,re-request of bills delivery status etc. Delivery Modes Strategy - Well ahead road-map would be useful to ensure what types of communication options are planned. If it is multiple options like white mail,e-mail,fax,posting on web-sites etc. It is good to include all these in the RFP to get Appropriate costs in the initial stages which helps in vendor selection inline with future roadmaps
|
It's easy to contribute articles, article proposals, commentary and analysis and be published online through Energy Central!
Sound interesting? Contact the editor for more information.