Energy Storage Will Raise the Efficiency, Reliability, and Security of the Electricity Transmission Grid

Posted on December 12, 2002
Posted By: Richard Baxter
 
Rapidly changing economic, regulatory, and technical forces have stressed and brought about an under-investment in the underlying transmission infrastructure—a condition that energy storage technologies can improve at a much lower cost. Energy Storage technologies can raise the capability—and flexibility—of existing assets, helping to minimize the costs needed to meet growing demand, improving power quality for cost control, and opening up new and innovative market opportunities. Some storage technologies are designed to provide long-duration discharges of energy, while others focus their discharge capability on a shorter timeframe and higher power delivery. By providing energy resources on demand, these assets can help to increase the utilization of existing generation and transmission facilities, improving their efficiency. Storage facilities can also provide for a means to inject bulk energy to curtail peak demands on the power facilities, and reactive power to maintain a stable and working grid—conditions that will improve the reliability and security of the Grid.

Utilities recognized the importance of these technologies and built many of them in the 70’s and 80’s, resulting in large-scale storage facilities representing nearly 3% of all generation capacity by the early 1990s. Pressure from deregulation caused this investment to fall off, and their impact on the Grid will continue to diminish over time as their representation in the overall market shrinks without renewed support. A growing number of private industry firms are now entering this market with updated and innovative energy storage technologies, which stand to reverse this trend.

By maintaining a cache of ready power, these assets can provide much needed flexibility in times of extreme urgency. The benefits of this ready power will be most easily seen in the improvement in the efficiency, reliability, and security of the Grid. Efficiency
At its heart, energy storage is an economic decision. Without storage, an industry must develop and maintain an entire delivery network capable of meeting the highest peak of the year. With storage, the owners only must build out what is necessary to carry a heavy, but normal load—resulting in a much higher utilization of the existing equipment, and hence a higher return on their investments (ROI). Without sufficient storage capacity in the electric power industry, excess generation and transmission facilities have been built and remain underused for much of the year. On average, power facilities are used only 55% of the time; and transmission systems are only marginally better at 60%. By establishing a number of caches of energy along the value chain, storage can balance supply with demand on short timelines. This allows for a more efficient use of the existing resources in the market, lowering prices and improving the quality of the service.

  • Energy Storage assets can assist in optimizing transmission grid functions—improving the efficiency of the grid.
  • As the entire Grid operates more efficiently, more private industry firms will invest in this market and bring forward other innovative technologies—raising the quality of service and capability of the Grid.
Reliability
Large-scale energy storage facilities can dramatically improve the level of reliability in the wholesale transmission market. In the event of a single power plant failure, a storage facility can step in quickly and replace it until another power facility can be called up to start generating. (In the event of a total Grid failure, these large-scale energy storage systems can act as giant batteries, helping to bring power plants back on-line and restore service to everyone.) Currently, smaller power facilities that are left running but not connected to a load (or only at partial load) provide this back-up service. Most ancillary services (grid stabilization and protection) like this are simply expected of power producers without much remuneration. However, as the market changes, the opportunity cost of running these power facilities to supply these services will grow. With expected changes in the transmission market, the real cost of these services will be brought to the fore, and storage assets could very well become the preferred supplier of these services.

Energy storage facilities can also improve the reliability of retail customer’s electricity service. It is estimated that poor power quality costs businesses $150 billion a year in lost productivity. Electricity consumers need assurances that the power they contract for is delivered as the market evolves through deregulation. Otherwise, economic growth will be stymied as firms expend mostly wasted effort attempting to solve this problem with the wrong tools. On-site energy storage assets can dramatically improve the firm’s power quality, and hold a small cache of energy to let the firm “ride-through” short power outages.

  • Energy Storage assets enhance the capability of other components of the transmission grid—increasing the robustness of additional assets on the grid to respond to contingencies.
  • Energy Storage assets will be the first line of response to a shortfall in power supply. They would provide sufficient power to maintain integrity of the grid while additional generation assets are brought on-line.

Security
The Security of the electric power grid requires maintaining and improving the level of reliability and capability of the network. Unforeseen events can come from volatility from normal operations, and contingencies from unplanned failures of a component. By providing a first-response potential, and enhancing the capability of other assets Energy Storage assets will improve the Security of the US electric power grid.

Energy Storage has a vital role to play in the future security of the US wholesale electricity transmission grid. Storage assets placed strategically throughout the network are the only assets that can immediately respond to failures on the grid in a flexible manner. Acting much as a shock absorber, Energy Storage will be the first line of reaction to unforeseen events across the entire transmission network. Acting in concert with other technologies in a coordinated fashion, they will be an essential component to improve the reliability and capability of the network, issues that are necessary to enhance overall Security.

Energy Storage also has a role to play in enhancing the Security of the retail electricity market. Large commercial and industrial users increasingly rely on electricity to power information technology and precision manufacturing equipment—equipment that does not allow for power disruptions without serious repercussions to their bottom line. Currently, UPS (universal power supply) energy storage devices are used to provide reactionary protection for some critical loads. However, energy storage assets could also be incorporated into other retail energy strategies to improve the capability of the consumer to weather events.

  • Energy Storage assets can act as a fast-reacting, “bridging-power” source in the event of a power failure. Production would be maintained until an on-site generator is brought on-line.
  • Energy Storage assets can guarantee a higher level of reliable, clean power—enhancing loss prevention.
  • Energy Storage assets could allow vital installations to go off-grid while still maintaining full operational capability.
 
 
Authored By:
Richard is a Sr. Technology Analyst with Ardour Capital Investments, an investment bank specializing in energy technologies and alternative energy markets. In this role, Richard focuses on evaluating energy technologies and their related business models. Richard has 15 years of experience evaluating energy and environmental technologies and is the author of Energy Storage: A Nontechnical Guide (PennWell Publishing, 2005), numerous market and technical reports, industry journal articles, and is an
 

Other Posts by: Richard Baxter

Related Posts

Storing Energy from the Sea By Eric Hahn P.E.
 
 

Comments

December, 16 2002

Don Glenn says

Mr. Baxter does a good job of "selling" the concept of energy storage in this article. However, the Energy Storage story is not new. In 1975-6, I led a precedent-setting systems study of this area in a project sponsored by the then Energy Research and Development Administration (ERDA), now DOE, that not only presented this very same story in great detail, but also reviewed the state-of-the-art in storage technologies. Since then, many storage technologies have been pursued including advanced batteries for bulk storage-zinc-bromine flow systems, sodium/sulfur and zinc slurry schemes and redox flow batteries. More advanced concepts were also triesdin the laboratories including molten salts and change of phase systems. All were shown to have promise but none have been developed to the point of practical large-scale demonstrations. The move to restructure and deregulate utility generation (and storage) functions has essentially shut down all R&D in these areas. The Public Benefits Charges, where they exist at the state level, provide inadequate support for continuing expensive R&D programs formerly sponsored by DOE, EPRI, APPA and NRECA, among others.

The author mentions no technologies now in some advanced stage of development to apply to the problem of peak shaving or load leveling. Thus, while I applaud his recognition for the value of energy storage, Mr. Baxter does not advance the cause beyond that of retelling an old story...maybe it needs retelling to ignite new interest; but who will pay for the R&D, and it's early application?

December, 17 2002

James Moody says

Mr. Glenn apparently is unaware of the CAES (Compressed Air Enery Storage Site in Alabama. This site has been operating sucessfuly for over 10 years. it is capable of producing 110 MW of power. It has been used for peak shaving and back-up power for a coal fired plant. CAES Plants store energy in the form of compressed air in an underground cavern or aquafier. This compressed air is used along with natural gas to generate power with turbine expanders. The Plant can go from idle to full power in 14 minutes. All major components in a CAES plant are proven technologies which can be utilized now.

December, 17 2002

Joe Smith says

Mr Glenn--Perhaps you should look at the Vanadium Redox Battery now being rolled out by Vanteck and SEI.

Details are at http://www.vrbpower.com.

Look for details for the Moab installation

December, 17 2002

M. Keith Graham says

Mr. Glenn -- You do not mention pumped storage facilities as probably the best and most widely used currently available technology; a simple but effective and proven methodology. While there may be some siting considerations to resolve, expansion of this approach is likely to be the most environmental friendly of the technologies under consideration. I agree with you that this country should organize action to better manage our energy production assets.

Check out http://www.aucmi.org/resources/ludington.html

December, 18 2002

**** **** says

Septimus van der Linden 12/18/02 The Energy Storage story needs to be retold as much as possible, there is a need to communicate the value. Pumped Hydro was understood and made a difference--till sites became dificult to license, or the un-informed interfered.The positive contributions by previous commentors are very much inline. Clean Coal plants , or cleaning up of coal plants are in vogue.New efficient low emission coal plants can be built in 500 MW modules, and with CAES plant of nominal 300MW--800MW can be deliverd for 12 hours or more during the day. This "extends" the clean coal plant using the low night time demand to deliver more than it's daily design capability. Yes some small amount of premium gas fuel is used--the benefits of low emissions per MW/hr, operating the coal plant steadily at design values, with load swings and rapid response taken care of by the CAES plant. Many operating modes/scenmarios can be described--the bottom line is--does the CAES plant deliver energy at a lower cost than a less adaptive GT/CC plant ?--the answer is an unqualified Yes in today's market place where CC plant are on daily diapatch in most regions. Yes and CAES can be married to renewable energy such as Wind Farms, and so deliver more of the "green" energy at times when it is most needed, not just when the wind blows, many times only at night--greater utilization of assets. While my comments relate to one form of Bulk Energy Storage--and is only one part of the story--more dialogue on Energy Storage and its ancillary benefits is required.

January, 21 2003

Chris Staidzack says

Mr. Glenn is also apparently unfamiliar with the people pushing today's energy storage technology forward--although he does seem to very conversant in the history of energy technology pre-DOE (30 years ago!). Just because the technology may not have been ready at that time does not mean that energy storage technology is not ready now.

www.energystorage.org

I also searched Power Engineering and found a good article on CAES technology by Mr. van der Linden. www.pepei.pennnet.com - Power Engineering, April 2001

Add your comments:

Please log in to leave a comment!
back to top


Sponsored Content